 
|
|
|
( 21.08.2008 )
|
|
|
|
( 28.07.2008 )
|
|
|
|
( 21.04.2008 )
|
|
|
|
( 12.02.2008 )
|
|
|
|
( 10.02.2008 )
|
|
|
|
( 12.10.2007 )
|
|
|
|
( 17.07.2007 )
|
|
|
|
( 03.07.2007 )
|
|
|
|
( 13.04.2007 )
|
|
|
|
( 29.01.2007 )
|
|
|
Categories
Discussion
Main - Rune Quest
RE:Lang.skills
|
Author:
Bjorn Are Stolen
|
Time:
29.01.2003 23:07
|
Text:
> I too have some experience with other languages. I learned
> French when I was very young, studied Japanese at
> university and I'm learning Cantonese (a Chinese dialect)
> from my wife. Yes, learning by doing is definitely the most
> effective. But I would argue that this is what is reflected
> by treating language acquisition in RQ as a matter of
> practice or research, rather than experience checks for
> this or that particularly stressful usage.
>
> Note that this also fits with your observations of rapid
> improvement at an early level which slacks off somewhat as
> fluency improves. By the research and training rules of
> RQ3, it takes all of one hour for someone with a 1% skill
> to qualify for an improvement roll. Once you hit 30%, you
> need 30 hours to improve, and so forth.
Yes, good arguments. To me, it's more a question wether you call talking to a travellingcompanion for 6 sucsesive days for research or experience. To mee, the recearch \training sounds a bit too alien to ring true in my ears.
|
Message threads
| Topic: |
Author: |
Time: |
|
|
|
Bjorn Are Stolen
|
27.01.2003 15:34
|
|
|
|
Tom Cantine
|
27.01.2003 23:29
|
|
|
|
Bjorn Are Stolen
|
28.01.2003 14:32
|
|
|
|
Anonymous
|
29.01.2003 06:43
|
|
|
|
Bjorn Are Stolen
|
29.01.2003 23:07
|
|
|
|
Tom Cantine
|
30.01.2003 04:52
|
|
|
|
Peter Beirne
|
12.02.2003 21:03
|
|
For any questions or comments about this site,
contact the webmaster
www.runequest.za.org is hosted by
www.wack.co.za
W&C Information Consultants CC
|
|
|
