 
|
|
|
( 21.08.2008 )
|
|
|
|
( 28.07.2008 )
|
|
|
|
( 21.04.2008 )
|
|
|
|
( 12.02.2008 )
|
|
|
|
( 10.02.2008 )
|
|
|
|
( 12.10.2007 )
|
|
|
|
( 17.07.2007 )
|
|
|
|
( 03.07.2007 )
|
|
|
|
( 13.04.2007 )
|
|
|
|
( 29.01.2007 )
|
|
|
Categories
Discussion
Main - Rune Quest
my conclution to our exchange of thought
|
Author:
Bjorn Are Stolen
|
Time:
26.01.2003 11:37
|
Text:
> In the errata, they actually go a little ways towards this
> by saying that soft armour counts as half its value against
> blunt weapons. So, your 7 point chain mail is only good for
> 4 points against a mace.
There you see! It's usually allways in the rules allready, but since I don't have the errata, I'm more interrested in the suggestions you have below.
> Another way to deal with it is to simply invent a new
> weapon feature, specifically designed to overcome armour,
> and then allow these features to be added to weapons, like
> the swordbreaker option in RQ3. So you could have a mace
> with anti-plate spikes on it, and say this feature cancels
> out 4 points of armour protection, but doesn't affect
> rolled damage.
>
> Then a quick look over the existing weapons and decide if
> any of them should have this as a standard feature. Only
> the hammer, I think, is a likely candidate. Also, I think
> I'd want to rule that only certain sorts of weapons can
> have this feature added on.
OK, then! Warhammers \ piercing maces (welded in one piece) can subtract 4 AP's from any armor (in my rules).
Conclution:
I think that I don't want to distinguish between crushing and cutting \ thrusting damage.
I will apply the piercingrules just above.
I will remove the impaling rules (the one giving extra damage for retrieving a weapon stuck).
Then I will use the rule that if you want to try several fast and light nibbles at your opponent, you loose one dam. (minimum 1) but you get to act on one SR earlier.
Thrusts cannot damage the AP's of weapon, shield and armor.
If you want to deflect a sweep, you subtract 10% or 10 from your parrying skill (whatever is the highest), but if successful, your parrying weapon don't take damage from exessive damage.
Thanks! Without our conversation, none of theese houserules would have surfaced!
|
Message threads
| Topic: |
Author: |
Time: |
|
|
|
Tom Cantine
|
25.01.2003 07:09
|
|
|
|
Bjorn Are Stolen
|
25.01.2003 13:27
|
|
|
|
Tom Cantine
|
26.01.2003 02:12
|
|
|
|
Bjorn Are Stolen
|
26.01.2003 11:37
|
|
|
|
Tom Cantine
|
26.01.2003 21:58
|
|
|
|
Bjorn Are Stolen
|
27.01.2003 15:19
|
|
|
|
Tom Cantine
|
27.01.2003 23:42
|
|
|
|
Bjorn Are Stolen
|
28.01.2003 15:19
|
|
|
|
Tom Cantine
|
29.01.2003 06:13
|
|
|
|
Peter Beirne
|
13.02.2003 18:48
|
|
|
|
Bjorn Are Stolen
|
13.02.2003 20:23
|
|
|
|
Peter Beirne
|
17.02.2003 19:10
|
|
|
|
Bjorn Are Stolen
|
17.02.2003 19:50
|
|
|
|
Peter Beirne
|
17.02.2003 20:17
|
|
|
|
Bjorn Are Stolen
|
19.02.2003 02:20
|
|
|
|
Tom Cantine
|
19.02.2003 05:41
|
|
|
|
Bjorn Are Stolen
|
19.02.2003 17:01
|
|
|
|
Peter Beirne
|
19.02.2003 20:06
|
|
|
|
Bjorn Are Stolen
|
19.02.2003 22:07
|
|
|
|
Peter Beirne
|
20.02.2003 00:40
|
|
|
|
Bjorn Are Stolen
|
20.02.2003 16:33
|
|
|
|
Peter Beirne
|
20.02.2003 18:00
|
|
|
|
Bjorn Are Stolen
|
20.02.2003 22:20
|
|
|
|
Tom Cantine
|
21.02.2003 18:26
|
|
|
|
Bjorn Are Stolen
|
21.02.2003 19:17
|
|
|
|
Peter Beirne
|
21.02.2003 20:51
|
|
|
|
Bjorn Are Stolen
|
22.02.2003 00:41
|
|
For any questions or comments about this site,
contact the webmaster
www.runequest.za.org is hosted by
www.wack.co.za
W&C Information Consultants CC
|
|
|
