 
|
|
|
( 21.08.2008 )
|
|
|
|
( 28.07.2008 )
|
|
|
|
( 21.04.2008 )
|
|
|
|
( 12.02.2008 )
|
|
|
|
( 10.02.2008 )
|
|
|
|
( 12.10.2007 )
|
|
|
|
( 17.07.2007 )
|
|
|
|
( 03.07.2007 )
|
|
|
|
( 13.04.2007 )
|
|
|
|
( 29.01.2007 )
|
|
|
Categories
Discussion
Main - Rune Quest
RE: Some Rule clarifications
|
Author:
Peter Beirne
|
Time:
25.02.2003 07:37
|
Text:
THanks for the responses on my points. Some additional responses-
>
> > Two weapons should be able to be parry the same weapon.
> > This is essentially a cross parry.
>
> Agree, but I don't know how this should differ from an
> ordinary parry exept from that you use two actions on one
> parry, perhaps?
>
Well it would be different by combining the AP for the block if both are successful before letting damage through.
> > Two weapons also should be allowed to attack
> simultaneous
> > with an aimed attack, both hitting in the same SR. The
> two
> > weapons should be the same though. The weapons should be
> > counted as one weapon for attack damage and being
> parried.
> > Should be considered individual weapon for dodging.
>
> I think this doesn't fit into the RQ consept of the mellee
> round; mabye if you use it in conjunction with the "aimed
> attack"?
>
I meant it to be used in conjunction with the aimed attack. It is to take into account those instance in which the two slashing weapons are used to try and cut of a mans head or when some tries to stab two daggers into someones back at the same time. The current rules would require the hits to occur on different sr
> > Finally, I play that Armor loses AP just like weapons.
> If
> > you get through the armor there has to be a hole in the
> > armor.
>
> In my houserules armor loose AP from cutting damage, but
> not from thrusts. I let The critical hit cover the
> possebility to hit in a hole in the armor. I'm seriously
> considering to divide the armor into three categories;
> piercing AP, cutting AP and bashing AP; this will
> complicate things, but allso make everything more
> realistic. You try and cut through chainmail... Then try
> and bash somebody with chainmail, and finally try and stab
> him. I know what I'd go for (rapier...)
>
I think the errata with the soft armor rules works well enough on different weapons. I see your point about the impale damage though.
I have the Collesuim books, I will look at. If your encumberance system is in an easy format to post or send - I would like to take a gander at it.
|
Message threads
| Topic: |
Author: |
Time: |
|
|
|
Peter Beirne
|
24.02.2003 20:23
|
|
|
|
Bjorn Are Stolen
|
24.02.2003 23:20
|
|
|
|
Peter Beirne
|
25.02.2003 07:37
|
|
|
|
Bjorn Are Stolen
|
26.02.2003 02:32
|
|
|
|
Peter Beirne
|
26.02.2003 17:16
|
|
|
|
Tom Cantine
|
15.03.2003 01:11
|
|
|
|
Bjorn Are Stolen
|
17.03.2003 22:23
|
|
|
|
Tom Cantine
|
19.03.2003 05:40
|
|
|
|
Bjorn Are Stolen
|
19.03.2003 12:06
|
|
For any questions or comments about this site,
contact the webmaster
www.runequest.za.org is hosted by
www.wack.co.za
W&C Information Consultants CC
|
|
|
