 
|
|
|
( 21.08.2008 )
|
|
|
|
( 28.07.2008 )
|
|
|
|
( 21.04.2008 )
|
|
|
|
( 12.02.2008 )
|
|
|
|
( 10.02.2008 )
|
|
|
|
( 12.10.2007 )
|
|
|
|
( 17.07.2007 )
|
|
|
|
( 03.07.2007 )
|
|
|
|
( 13.04.2007 )
|
|
|
|
( 29.01.2007 )
|
|
|
Categories
Discussion
Main - Rune Quest
RE: Impaling
|
Author:
Bjorn Are Stolen
|
Time:
17.02.2003 19:50
|
Text:
> > I solved it by actually dispose of the impalingrules.
> (the
> > part where you get an additional d6 roll for retrieving
> the
> > stuck object, I think the damagepotential from the spec\
> > crit hit is lethal enough. this way, thrusting and
> cutting
> > is even
> >
> I don't think that is solving the problem, but avoiding it.
> I find the impaling rules very plausible and realistic. I
> don't think you should get rid of them.
You're free to think they're extremely important for the game. I don't. A spear -have been used as example earlier -when special successing can do 2d10+4 = max.24 dam! If that's not enough to illustrate that the spear hit in, get stucked and have to be wresteled out of the wound afterwards, well...then you need the impalingrules.
My point was that I didn't come up with houserules to increase the slashing aspeckt of fighting without further complicating the system + making it too lethal; therefore I chose to dispose of the rule, letting the spec. \ crit dam illustrate any stuck weapons pulled out again.
> I am trying hard not to open my rule booklet - I am
> currenty in school and just happened to find this website -
> but if I start pulling out rules my studies will suffer -
> but in my games impaling weapons I would only give half of
> the damage modifier - I can't remember if that is the rule
> or a Pete-ism. This may help bring some equilibrium to
> it.
I think it does an additional d6 dam for pulling weapons out again after they're stuck. (I'll might let it pass for arrows with "fishhoock"-style (I'm norwegian and don't know what the shape of arrows is called in english)
If I was orced to retain impalingrules (for some wierd reason), I'd definately go for your suggestion to use the dam.bonus instead of 1d6.
>
|
Message threads
| Topic: |
Author: |
Time: |
|
|
|
Tom Cantine
|
25.01.2003 07:09
|
|
|
|
Bjorn Are Stolen
|
25.01.2003 13:27
|
|
|
|
Tom Cantine
|
26.01.2003 02:12
|
|
|
|
Bjorn Are Stolen
|
26.01.2003 11:37
|
|
|
|
Tom Cantine
|
26.01.2003 21:58
|
|
|
|
Bjorn Are Stolen
|
27.01.2003 15:19
|
|
|
|
Tom Cantine
|
27.01.2003 23:42
|
|
|
|
Bjorn Are Stolen
|
28.01.2003 15:19
|
|
|
|
Tom Cantine
|
29.01.2003 06:13
|
|
|
|
Peter Beirne
|
13.02.2003 18:48
|
|
|
|
Bjorn Are Stolen
|
13.02.2003 20:23
|
|
|
|
Peter Beirne
|
17.02.2003 19:10
|
|
|
|
Bjorn Are Stolen
|
17.02.2003 19:50
|
|
|
|
Peter Beirne
|
17.02.2003 20:17
|
|
|
|
Bjorn Are Stolen
|
19.02.2003 02:20
|
|
|
|
Tom Cantine
|
19.02.2003 05:41
|
|
|
|
Bjorn Are Stolen
|
19.02.2003 17:01
|
|
|
|
Peter Beirne
|
19.02.2003 20:06
|
|
|
|
Bjorn Are Stolen
|
19.02.2003 22:07
|
|
|
|
Peter Beirne
|
20.02.2003 00:40
|
|
|
|
Bjorn Are Stolen
|
20.02.2003 16:33
|
|
|
|
Peter Beirne
|
20.02.2003 18:00
|
|
|
|
Bjorn Are Stolen
|
20.02.2003 22:20
|
|
|
|
Tom Cantine
|
21.02.2003 18:26
|
|
|
|
Bjorn Are Stolen
|
21.02.2003 19:17
|
|
|
|
Peter Beirne
|
21.02.2003 20:51
|
|
|
|
Bjorn Are Stolen
|
22.02.2003 00:41
|
|
For any questions or comments about this site,
contact the webmaster
www.runequest.za.org is hosted by
www.wack.co.za
W&C Information Consultants CC
|
|
|
